| Next Entries in Category »

Religions: Baal is Antichrist

[Print] | [Email]

Baal is AntiChrist. Like Nabu, who usurps the place of his father Marduk in Babylonian mythology; like Thoth in Egyptian mythology, who substitutes and replaces Ra; like Zeus, who rebels against his father Chronos and takes his place as chief of the pantheon ?Eso Baal attacks and replaces his father El. And that is to say that all these gods are false sons, sons who attack and kill the father, Oedipal sons, and not the Son who glorifies the Father and reveals Him.

And, yes, I’m back to reading Derrida.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Monday, October 13, 2003 at 12:05 pm

Religions: More on Two Faces of Islam

[Print] | [Email]

Well, there’s a problem with speaking well of a book before reading far enough in it. I’m still learning a lot from Stephen Schwartz’s Two Faces of Islam, but fairly early in the book he makes it clear that he’s working with the view that at least all “Abrahamic faiths” can work together for the betterment of mankind. His hope is that “Islam may . . . fulfill its destiny as a positive force for all humanity.” So, my enthusiasm for the book is now a significantly qualified enthusiasm.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, October 4, 2003 at 8:46 am

Religions: Schwartz on Islam

[Print] | [Email]

I have been reading Stephen Schwartz’s wonderful pieces on Islam in the Weekly Standard for several years. Schwartz has done as much as any journalist to highlight the responsibility and role of Saudi Arabia for the rise of radical Islam, and particularly the central importance of the Wahhabi sect in modern Islam. I have been eager to dig into his recent The Two Faces of Islam: The House of Sa’ud from Tradition to Terror. It is even better than I expected, and I was expecting it to be good. Schwartz has a profound historical sense, and has done extensive research in various issues related to the Middle East.

The “two faces” of his title are the peaceful, tolerant, and pluralist face of traditional Islam and the violent and intolerant face of the Wahhabi sect. Early in the book, for instance, he challenges the notion that hatred between Muslims and Jews is centuries old, a myth that leads to a vicious quietism in the face of Jewish-Islamic conflict. He explains his research into the “dhimma,” the “contract” concerning Muslim relations with “People of the Book”:

A valuable truth about the dhimma and its consequences emerges from a topic seldom discussed in this context: Jewish printing. The first book printed by Western technique in Asia was a Jewish legal code, the Arba Turim or Four Rows, authored by Rabbi Yakov Ben Asher of Toledo (c. 1270-c. 1343). This exquisitely designed typographical gem was issued in Constantinople in 1493. . . . The first book printed in the continent of Africa was an edition of Abudarham, a collection of laws and commentaries on prayer, written in 1340 by Rabbi David Ben Yosef of Sevilla. This volume was produced in the Moroccan city of Fez in 1516. Both of these books, and hundreds more after them, were produced under Muslim rulers.

Schwartz goes on to point out that Jews were free and unpersecuted in the Ottoman empire during the time that Jews were being persecuted in parts of Christian Europe.

I’m not far enough into the book to know how sharply Schwartz distinguishes between the “two faces,” but the historical details cited above point to the fact that Islam is far more complex than some Christian rhetoric has suggested.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Friday, October 3, 2003 at 10:54 pm

| Next Entries in Category »

Permission is given to use material on this site, provided the source is cited, blog entries are republished in full, and the author is notified in advance.