The Moral of Henry VPeter J. Leithart, October 14, 2006 Much of the moral and political import of Shakespeare's Henry V is left to the audience's or reader's judgment. Is Henry a "pig" or is he the mirror of Christian kings? Is his invasion of France fair or foul? Shakespeare doesn't show his hand, or not much; and one is tempted to say that Henry's invasion is, like the day that opens Macbeth, foul and fair. Aaron Hill, an eighteenth century adapter of Shakespeare wanted to make the moral obvious, so he appended a prologue and changed the final lines. His prologue reads: No barren Tale t'amuse, our Scene imparts: After that kind of jingoist opening, the audience is no doubt as fired to fight Frenchmen as Henry's own men after his Crispin's Day speech. At least we know: France is full of vice; England of virtue; and my goodness shouldn't Virtue just cross the Channel and trounce Vice? And why stop at the Channel? If France is full of vice, surely Africa, India, the South Sea islands must be cesspools as well, just waiting to be cleared by virtuous Englishmen. The ending of Hill's play also dramatically alters the tone of the original. Shakespeare's play ends with a grim, de-crescending reminder of the loss of France and the bloody Wars of the Roses that occurred in the reign of Henry's successor. Hill turns it into another patriotic rallying cry for service to the State: Thus have our Arms, triumphany, purchas'd Fame, |
http://www.leithart.com/archives/print/002454.php