Trinity, Worship, and DialoguePeter J. Leithart, December 18, 2004 INTRODUCTION ACCESS TO THE FATHER IN SON AND SPIRIT The clearest passage in this regard is Ephesians 2:11-22. A few comments are in order. First, the overall context has to do with the inclusion of Gentiles in the one new man,EJesus Christ. Those who have been excluded strangers to the covenants and commonwealth of Israel (v. 12), those who were far off (v. 13) are now brought near (v. 13). JesusEdeath not only builds a bridge between God and man, but breaks down the wall that separated Jew and Gentile in the Old Covenant. Second, because of this, Jews and Gentiles together not only make up a new manEor new humanity (a new Adam), but also make up a new householdE(v. 19) and are being built into a temple for the Lord, a dwelling of God by the Spirit (vv. 21-22). The phrase strangers and aliensEgoes back to Numbers, which denies access to the holy place to those who are strangersE(Numbers 1:51; 3:10). Thus, the union of Jew and Gentile is specifically a liturgical union. In this context, Paul speaks of the accessEthat we have to the Father (v 18). This common access of both Jews and Gentiles depends on the work of the Son and the Spirit. The access is through Him,Ethat is through the One who is Himself our peace,Ewho abolished in His flesh the enmity,Ewho reconciled them both in one body to God through the cross,Ewho came and preached peaceE(vv. 14, 15, 16, 17). And our access to the Father is also in the one SpiritEwho is given to both Jews and Gentiles. Thus, our approach to God involves the whole Trinity: We approach the Father through the mediation of the Son, and in the power of the Spirit. (Basil the Great spoke of the Spirit as the placeEwhere we worship the Father through the Son.) As Robert Letham has explained it, the worship of the church is the communion of the Holy Trinity with us his people. We are inclined to view worship as what we do, but . . . it is first and foremost something the triune God does, our actions initiated and encompassed by his. . . . Since our salvation is received in union with Christ, what is his by nature is ours by grace. Thus, in his self-offering to the Father, he offers us his people in him. We are thereby enabled to share in the relation that he has with the Father. . . . Thus, Christ is, in reality, the one true worshiper, and our worship is a participation in his. A focus on our worship, on what we do, is inherently Pelagian. Further, our worship is by the Holy Spirit in Christ. As John Thompson puts it, If one understands the New Testament and the view it gives of how we meet with and know God and worship him as triune, then worship is not primarily our act but, like our salvation, is Gods gift before or as it is our task. We join in JesusESpirit-infused praise to the Father, His prayer to the Father, His self-offering. GODS WORK ON US As Jeff Meyers has pointed out, this helps us to understand why it is we gather for church on Sunday. Reformed folk often criticize the idea that we gather to receive from God, arguing that worship is God-centered and thus we gather to give God something. But this is dangerously one-sided, and is in danger of becoming Pelagian. The chief poles of worship are Word and Sacrament, and both are Gods gifts to us, not something we conjure up for Gods benefit. We gather for worship so that the Triune God can renew us by cleansing our sin, instructing us in the way of righteousness, and feeding us at His table. DIALOGUE This is reflected in the large-scale dialogue between God and man in historic liturgies: God calls, we respond by entering His courts with praise; God calls us to kneel for confession, and we kneel; God declares us forgiven, and we rejoice; God speaks to us, and we confess our sin; God invites us to the table, and we come to eat and drink. And this dialogic element is also evident in the various traditional interchanges of the historic liturgies (sursum corda; The Lord be with youE; Thanks be to GodE). But what is the root of this dialogue in worship? One might say that its basic to the covenant-making between God and man, and thats true. The minister is ordained to speak the words of God for the people of God, and in responding to the minister the church is responding to the authorized representative of God. (If this sounds like its unduly elevating the minister, the effect is in fact the opposite. On this view, the minister has NO authority of his own to say anything Eno authority to call people into Gods presence, no authority to declare absolution, no authority to teach Scripture, no authority to invite people to the Lords table, no authority to send people out as the Father sent the Son.EIf the minister is NOT a representative of God in the liturgy, then by who or what authorizes him to talk so boldly, not to say blasphemously?) We renew fellowship with God through a liturgical conversation.EBut I think theres something deeper. The dialogic pattern seems to be rooted in the Trinitarian realities of worship. The Spirit dwells in us, and intercedes for us with groanings that cannot be uttered (Romans 8:26). When we pray in the Spirit, the Spirit prays with us, and we are caught up by the Spirit into the inter-Trinitarian conversation. Similarly, if our prayers are prayers in and through Jesus, then again our prayers have been incorporated by grace into the inter-Trinitarian communion. Worship is dialogic not only accidentally, but fundamentally, because worship is fundamentally about our inclusion in the Triune dialogueE(trialogue sounds hokey). |
http://www.leithart.com/archives/print/001034.php