Sermon Outline, March 28Peter J. Leithart, March 24, 2004 Jesus on Trial, Luke 22:63E3:25 INTRODUCTION THE TEXT PROPHESY Second, the Sanhedrin proper focuses on JesusEclaims to be Messiah or Christ, the Anointed One (v. 67). This is not really an investigation, since the council has already made up its mind that Jesus is not the Christ. They are trying to catch Jesus saying something that will make him seem dangerous to the Romans (cf. 20:19-26). Since “ChristEand “Son of GodEare royal titles, if Jesus admits that He is Christ they can bring Him before Pilate. JesusEanswers are evasive (vv. 67-68, 70), or else He remains completely silent. What else can we expect? Jesus has been seeking to persuade and debate with the Jewish leaders for several years, and they have grown increasingly hostile. They have been beating Him and mocking His claim to be a prophet. Can there be any reasonable discussion now? Jesus knows that there is no possibility of persuasion. But there is another thing going on as well: Jesus is the Lamb who is being led dumb to the shearers (Isaiah 53:7). Instead of offering an extended speech before the courts, as many Hellenistic heroes did and as Paul does in Acts, Jesus says almost nothing and makes no defense. He knows there is a Judge beyond the judges He faces, and He trusts that Judge to vindicate Him. KING OF THE JEWS Pilate, however, repeatedly declares Jesus innocent (vv. 4, 14-15, 22). This has several implications. First, that JesusEdeath is the result of a gross miscarriage of justice. Pilate knows Jesus to be innocent, but buckles to the pressure of the Jewish mob and kills Jesus anyway. Jesus is again “exposing hearts,Ebringing to light the injustice at the heart of the vaunted Roman legal and judicial system. In this sense, Pilate (and with him Rome) is more the one on trial than Jesus. Second, Pilate is inadvertently pronouncing God’s own verdict on Jesus, a verdict that God will promulgate when He raises Jesus from the dead. Third, this leaves the Jews primarily responsible for the death of Jesus, who is ultimately “delivered . . . to their willE(v. 25). The elect people are the leaders in rejecting Jesus. The Jews know what makes Pilate tick. As a Roman prefect, he is especially concerned with public order, and anyone stirring up the people Eregardless of whether or not he claims to be a king Eis a threat to public order (v. 5), especially during a major festival. Pilate discovers a potential out when he learns that Jesus is a Galilean. Herod can take care of the problem. BEFORE THE FOX Herod gets into the spirit of the trial. He and his soldiers, following the lead of the Sanhedrin, mock Jesus, especially His royal claims. Herod shows that he shares Pilate’s contempt for Jewish kings, and they unite in their hostility to Jesus. When Pilate sent Jesus to Herod, he recognized Herod’s authority (v. 7), and this sign of honor from Pilate was a basis for an alliance. At another level, however, the reconciliation of Pilate and Herod points to the real purpose of JesusEdeath, to undo the division of Roman and Jew, and to unite them in friendship. This is an infernal parody of Christian communion, but it points to the true communion. BARABBAS OR JESUS? Here again, there is far more going on than Pilate or the Jews realize. The choice of Barabbas over Jesus is the choice of insurrection over peace, and the Jews will pay dearly for that choice within a generation. Further, this episode dramatically highlights what is really going on in JesusEtrial: He is standing trial as a substitute, being put to death for sins that He did not commit, sins that were endorsed by many of the Jews. Even more, we are all Barabbas, rebels against God and participants in the murder of Jesus. Yet, Jesus takes our place and bears the punishment of our sins in Himself. We are sons of Adam, who was a rebellious Bar-Abba (“son of the fatherE; but the Son of the Father, the eternal Bar-Abba, takes our place. CONCLUSION Behold your God. |
http://www.leithart.com/archives/print/000563.php