 |
|
     |
|
|
|
Barth argues that 18th-century rational theology was rooted in prior commitments to peaceable citizenship and morality. The dynamic goes something like this: Christianity is interpreted pragmatically - it's about the transformation of human life; but it doesn't work - human life isn't transformed; there must therefore be something wrong with Christianity itself. All the scientific and philosophical discoveries of the 18th century are picked up as tools to critique a Christianity that doesn't mean prior moralistic standards.
Generalizing, Barth adds "Psychologically speaking, abstract theories of Christianity, whether they are positive or critical, are always a compensation for an actual (albeit at times very hidden) deficiency in Christian practice."
posted by Peter J. Leithart on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 06:38 PM
Permission is given to use material on this site, provided the source is cited, blog entries are republished in full, and the author is notified in advance.
1 & 2 Kings
Brazos Theological Commentary
The Promise Of His Appearing: An Exposition Of Second Peter
A Great Mystery: Fourteen Wedding Sermons
Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, And Hope In Western Literature
Miniatures & Morals: The Christian Novels of Jane Austen
The Priesthood of the Plebs: A Theology of Baptism
A Son To Me: An Exposition of 1 & 2 Samuel
From Silence to Song: The Davidic Liturgical Revolution
Ascent to Love: A Guide to Dante's Divine Comedy
Blessed Are the Hungry: Meditations on the Lord's Supper
A House For My Name: A Survey of the Old Testament
Heroes of the City of Man: A Christian Guide to Select Ancient Literature
Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide To Six Shakespeare Plays
Wise Words: Family Stories That Bring the Proverbs to Life
The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church
