 |
|
     |
|
|
|
There can be no objective scientific study of language, Rosenstock-Huessy claims. A common claim, but his argument is intriguing: The reason why we can't study language scientifically is because the language that would be studied is the pre-condition of science. Science requires leisure, leisure requires peace, and peace depends on common speech: "scholasrhip is based on a common bond between laity and scholars called the Church, and on a common law of freedom called the State, in our era. . . . The peace needed by the scientist and the speech which he makes the object of his studies, stand revealed, as one and the same process."
The "scientific" student of language cannot old language up as an external object, because language is a condition for the possibility of his investigation. The scientific study of language is always already involved with and dependent on what he wants to study.
posted by Peter J. Leithart on Friday, February 09, 2007 at 08:48 AM
Permission is given to use material on this site, provided the source is cited, blog entries are republished in full, and the author is notified in advance.
1 & 2 Kings
Brazos Theological Commentary
The Promise Of His Appearing: An Exposition Of Second Peter
A Great Mystery: Fourteen Wedding Sermons
Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, And Hope In Western Literature
Miniatures & Morals: The Christian Novels of Jane Austen
The Priesthood of the Plebs: A Theology of Baptism
A Son To Me: An Exposition of 1 & 2 Samuel
From Silence to Song: The Davidic Liturgical Revolution
Ascent to Love: A Guide to Dante's Divine Comedy
Blessed Are the Hungry: Meditations on the Lord's Supper
A House For My Name: A Survey of the Old Testament
Heroes of the City of Man: A Christian Guide to Select Ancient Literature
Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide To Six Shakespeare Plays
Wise Words: Family Stories That Bring the Proverbs to Life
The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church
