« Back | Home | Next »

 

Gospel biography?

[Theology - Christology | Link | Print]

It has become popular to describe the gospels as biographies, but Rosenstock-Huessy pre-challenged this trend (no doubt reacting to the lives-of-Jesus movement of the 18th and 19th centuries). Ancient biographies, he claims were actually "thanatographies," while "the story of Jesus makes sense only when his death begins and antecedes our lives." If the story of the gospel ends with the death of the biographess, Jesus remains "uninteresting": "If the tomb of Jesus is not the womb of the Christian era, we had better forget his whole story as a fairy tale."

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Friday, February 09, 2007 at 08:26 AM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com