« Back | Home | Next »

 

Art and appearance

[Art | Link | Print]

After Kant, and especially after Kant's romantic disciples, art came to be viewed as a matter of beautiful appearance, consciously defined in contrast to practical reality. This had not always been the Western conception of art. Gadamer comments, "Traditionally the purpose of 'art,' which also includes all conscious transformation of nature for human use, was to supplement and fill the gaps left open by nature. And 'the fine arts,' as long as they are seen in this framework, are a perfecting of reality, not appearances that mask, veil, or transfigure it." A painting or poem, in this view, does not hide reality but reveals its true character. Once art is seen as appearance, however, it floats free of reality, and becomes an autonomous realm of its own.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Wednesday, January 03, 2007 at 03:38 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com