« Back | Home | Next »

 

History of texts

[Hermeneutics | Link | Print]

One way to characterize the modern innovation in biblical interpretation is that it changes the Bible from a history of salvation into a history of documents. The Bible does not give access to history or the acts of God; it only gives us access to itself - the Bible as evidence of the formation of the Bible. Anyone who has suffered through a numbing self-referential OT seminar at SBL knows how true this is.

Gerard Bruns suggestively comments that the motive behind this shift is to "preserve alienation as a condition of freedom from the text." So long as the text is only about itself, it doesn't speak with any authority to the reader. It is a "dead letter, a purely analytical object." The Bible is no more authoritative than a file of disconnected family letters and photographs; the authority is all with the interpreter who seeks to construct an intelligible mosaic from the fragments.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, December 30, 2006 at 10:18 AM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com