 |
|
     |
|
|
|
Responding to Isaac Watts's claim that we love things purely out of our choice, Jonathan Edwards deftly isolated the problems of that position: When we choose one thing over another, we are clearly preferring that thing, but "that the mind sets a higher value on one thing than another, is not, in the first place, the fruit of its setting a higher value on that thing." If that were the case, then the choice would be purely sui generis, the desire for the thing a product of the desire for the thing. Watts's explanation is no explanation at all. For Watts, "I prefer X" is a base-line assertion, explainable only as "I prefer X." No explanations may be offered, no contrary arguments admitted. Just "I prefer X." As Roger Lundin points out, in that case we are all Bartleby the scrivener.
Instead, Edwards argued, preference is a symptom or sign of a "prevailing inclination of the soul." Changing preferences requires conversion.
posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, December 26, 2006 at 09:56 AM
Permission is given to use material on this site, provided the source is cited, blog entries are republished in full, and the author is notified in advance.
1 & 2 Kings
Brazos Theological Commentary
The Promise Of His Appearing: An Exposition Of Second Peter
A Great Mystery: Fourteen Wedding Sermons
Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, And Hope In Western Literature
Miniatures & Morals: The Christian Novels of Jane Austen
The Priesthood of the Plebs: A Theology of Baptism
A Son To Me: An Exposition of 1 & 2 Samuel
From Silence to Song: The Davidic Liturgical Revolution
Ascent to Love: A Guide to Dante's Divine Comedy
Blessed Are the Hungry: Meditations on the Lord's Supper
A House For My Name: A Survey of the Old Testament
Heroes of the City of Man: A Christian Guide to Select Ancient Literature
Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide To Six Shakespeare Plays
Wise Words: Family Stories That Bring the Proverbs to Life
The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church
