« Back | Home | Next »

 

Intention

[Hermeneutics | Link | Print]

Roger Lundin comments on the ironies of evangelical support for ED Hirsch and its frequent suspicion, if not outright condemnation, of Gadamer: "There are manifold ironies to the conservative embrace of Hirsch and spurning of Gadamer. At their heart is the fact that Hirsch's theory of intention has its roots in the same theological system that produced the Christological heresies these Protestants deplore. To counter subjectivism, that is, many Protestant critics have adopted an understanding of language and consciousness that originated in the very heresies these critics oppose. In the specific case of Hirsch, conservative critics have appropriated a theory of intentionality directly connected to Friedrich Schleiermacher's heterodox views of Christ, while Gadamer's understanding of interpretation issues in good part from Lutheran theology and trinitarian reflection. To complete the irony, it is Gadamer, the object of conservative suspicion, who offers a more satisfying theological model of interpretation than does Hirsch, the putative ally of the orthodox."

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Thursday, December 21, 2006 at 01:33 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com