« Back | Home | Next »

 

Rejoinders

[History | Link | Print]

Kenneth Burke wisely remarks that "Every document bequeathed us by history must be treated as a strategy for encompassing a situation," an "answer or rejoinder to assertions current in the situation in which it arose." He goes on to compare our entry into history to a late arrival to a parlor conversation - things are already underway, we don't know all that's been said before, we listen for awhile and make our contribution, and then have to leave when the debate is still in full swing.

When we forget this, we reify historical statements (let us say, Confessions) into timeless, contextless axioms instead of the "answers and rejoinders" they actually were.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 at 05:12 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com