« Back | Home | Next »

 

Discourses of power

[Politics | Link | Print]

Postmodernists claim that discourses are inevitably exercises of power. To theorize is to classify, and classification, well, puts things in classes, asserts authority over them. Butler offers this example: "You believe what the young surgeon tells you, and so you give him permission to anaesthetize you, cut you up, and help you recover. The language game of the discourse expresses and enacts the authority of those who are empowered to use it within a social group, which includes hospitals, law courts, boards of examiners, and professors. . . . It can also be used to subordinate or exclude or marginalize those who are outside it - witches, mesmerists, faith healers, homosexuals, Communist sympathizers, anarchist protesters."

True enough. Discourse is an exercise of power. But what is the problem with that, unless one assumes that one has a right to be free from all exercises of power - unless one assumes, in short, something very like the modern view of the autonomous self.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, August 08, 2006 at 06:04 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com