« Back | Home | Next »

 

Power of gift

[History | Link | Print]

Levi-Srauss doubts Mauss' spiritualization of the gift that Mauss draws from the Maori concept of "hau," the power that is communicated in, with, and under the gift. Rather, hau is "the conscious form whereby men of a given society . . . apprehended an unconscious necessity whose explanation lies elsewhere." There are, as Paul Ricoeur summarizes, "rules of symbolic thought" underlying and expressed by, but also concealed by, the notion of hau.

But Levi-Strauss misses a key point by reducing the gift to impersonal universal rules. In fact, he misses the gift and the giver. As Claude Lefort argues, "The idea that the gift must be returned presupposes that the other person is another self who must act as I do; and this return gesture has to confirm for me the truth of my own gesture, that is, my subjectivity. . . . Human beings [thereby] confirm to one another that they are not things."

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Thursday, April 13, 2006 at 03:36 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com