« Back | Home | Next »

 

Neutral public space

[Politics | Link | Print]

Markus wants to distinguish between the fact that people who act in the public realm always act with ultimate ends in view, and that their actions are either moral or immoral from the notion that there is a neutral public space. The public sphere, he claims, shouldn't be thought of as "the sum of a multiplicity or a fabric woven of many actions by many people." Rather, for Markus's Augustine, the public sphere is "much less personal," and consists of "practices, customs, institutions." To be sure, they "may be the cumulative effect of long sequences of human action, shaped by collective behavior over many generations, routinised or institutionalised over time. They have come to form a complex which now helps to shape and condition human action and behaviour, but they determine it no more - and no less - than a language determines what we say in it."

This is helpful, but it is hard to see how it yields a "neutral" public space. If the institutions and practices of a political community shape action, they shape it in a particular way, toward particular virtues, and away from others. As soon as a practice or custom takes form, that discriminates against alternative practices or customs. How is that neutrality?

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Thursday, March 30, 2006 at 03:33 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com