« Back | Home | Next »

 

Meta-Narrative's Revenge

[Philosophy | Link | Print]

Postmodern intellectuals believe they have seen through the arrogant or naive efforts of earlier generations of intellectuals. Now we see the folly of foundationalism, now we see that all knowledge is intertwined with regimes of power-knowledge, now we know that all thought arises from knotty aporias. We see that their meta-narratives of scientific progress were illusions, if not unConstitutional.

As Featherstone says, "the focus on the apparent naivete of the intellectuals of yesteryear, with their universalistic schemes, bring in a back doo sense of our own progress in knowledge over theirs with which to castigate their own false belief in progress." And totalization is condemned from the perspective of a (totalizing) claim that contemporary culture is postmodern.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 at 05:57 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com