« Back | Home | Next »

 

Typology of heresy

[Theology | Link | Print]

In his recent Brief History of Christianity, Carter Lindberg suggests that "orthodoxy is the language that preserves the promise character of the gospel, that salvation is received from God, not achieved by humans." By contrast, "heresy is the language that in one way or another vitiates the promise of the gospel by making it contingent on human experience."

He cites Schleiermacher to give flesh to that skeletal definition. According to Schleiermacher, heresies were either anthropological or soteriological, pertaining to the doctrine of man or to Christology. Anthropological heresies "either conceive of human nature as so intrinsically good that redemption is not necessary or as so intrinsically evil that redemption is impossible." Soteriological heresies present a Christ who in one way or another cannot save, either because "the nature of Jesus [is] so like that of humankind that he lacks the power to redeem or as so different from that of humankind that there is no point of contact."

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Thursday, December 08, 2005 at 04:42 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com