« Back | Home | Next »

 

Gunton on Genesis 1

[Theology - Creation | Link | Print]

In his Triune Creator, Colin Gunton offers this "argument" against reading Gen 1 as an account of six literal days of divine activity: "the sophistication and complexity of the writings make it clear that the authors, and that includes those who wrote the books in their canonical form, exclude - for example - any interpretation that insists that by the six days of the creation is meant six periods of twenty-four hours." Apparently, everyone knows - at least Gunton did - that a literal interpretation of Gen 1 has to be unsophisticated.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, November 01, 2005 at 05:55 PM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com