« Back | Home | Next »

Derrida's Platonism

No doubt I've said this before, but perhaps not so clearly:

1) Derrida makes the point that all language is fundamentally metaphorical, and that even what appears as pure dialectic is rhetoric all the way down.

2) Derrida says that because of this communication and meaning are indeterminate, deferred, etc.

3) To the extent that #2 BOTHERS Derrida, he is still operating against a horizone of "pure" and transparent communication. That is, the first two points may simply be descriptions of how creatures communicate, but if they are accurate descriptions that is simple how humans communicate, and we can register a complaint against this only if we are comparing this imperfect communication with a perfected form.

4) Derrida, as James KA Smith has pointed out, is haunted by the hopeless hope of pure communication. He knows that it doesn't exist, but he still compares actual communication to this perfect standard, and the comparison is unfavorable to actual languages.

Solomon Among the Postmoderns

The Baptized Body

1 & 2 Kings
Brazos Theological Commentary

The Promise Of His Appearing: An Exposition Of Second Peter

A Great Mystery: Fourteen Wedding Sermons

Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, And Hope In Western Literature

Miniatures & Morals: The Christian Novels of Jane Austen

The Priesthood of the Plebs: A Theology of Baptism

A Son To Me: An Exposition of 1 & 2 Samuel

Against Christianity

From Silence to Song: The Davidic Liturgical Revolution

Ascent to Love: A Guide to Dante's Divine Comedy

Blessed Are the Hungry: Meditations on the Lord's Supper

A House For My Name: A Survey of the Old Testament

Heroes of the City of Man: A Christian Guide to Select Ancient Literature

Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide To Six Shakespeare Plays

Wise Words: Family Stories That Bring the Proverbs to Life

The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church