Mary Lefkowitz's Greek Gods, Human Lives: What We Can Learn from Myths was published last year, and has been a recent selection for the Conservative Book Club. Lefkowitz argues that though we no longer share ancient theology, we "still have much to learn from listening to what the ancient writers say," and the "stories can still offer a reliable guide to life in our own time."
In particular, the myths confront us with a hard realistic view of things: "in the end, I believe, what caused people to abandon the traditional mythologiy was not the many fantasies it contains, but rather its ultimate realism: the myths show a world of evil forces, unpredictable change, difficult conditions, and inevitable death and defeat. By contrast, other religions offered security, and a promise of redemption both in this life and after death." In short, classical religion's "main advantage is that it describes mortal life as it really is, fragile, threatened, uncertain, and never consistently happy. They myths portray a world where deities exist primarily to please themselves, not to please or serve humanity. They offer no hope that justice will be done to any individual or within the course of anyone's lifetime. They do not suggest that it is easy or always possible for a mortal to distinguish right from wrong; on the contrary, they show that it is almost inevitable that they will make series mistakes, even when they have the best of intentions." Also, "Because there is no orthodoxy and no one deity to depend on, the burden is left to the individual. It is a religion for adults, and it offers responsibilities rather than rewards."
All of which shows that you can't really have the stories as a reliable guide to life without accepting the theology too. In what sense, for instance, is the claim that the gods exist for their own pleasure and good and not man's NOT a theological claim? How can we derive a sense of "what it is to be human" from the Greek myths while extracting the contrast of divine and human life? To put it in a structuralist idiom: How can we even define "human" in the Greek myths without seeing its difference from the binary opposite, "divine"?
posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 at 02:59 PM
Permission is given to use material on this site, provided the source is cited, blog entries are republished in full, and the author is notified in advance.

1 & 2 Kings
Brazos Theological Commentary

The Promise Of His Appearing: An Exposition Of Second Peter

A Great Mystery: Fourteen Wedding Sermons

Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, And Hope In Western Literature

Miniatures & Morals: The Christian Novels of Jane Austen

The Priesthood of the Plebs: A Theology of Baptism

A Son To Me: An Exposition of 1 & 2 Samuel

From Silence to Song: The Davidic Liturgical Revolution

Ascent to Love: A Guide to Dante's Divine Comedy

Blessed Are the Hungry: Meditations on the Lord's Supper

A House For My Name: A Survey of the Old Testament

Heroes of the City of Man: A Christian Guide to Select Ancient Literature

Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide To Six Shakespeare Plays

Wise Words: Family Stories That Bring the Proverbs to Life

The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church