« Back | Home | Next »

 

Smith on Pickstock

[Theology | Link | Print]

James Smith of Calvin College has an important analysis of Catherine Pickstock's attempt to conflate Christian incarnation and Platonic participation in his book, Speech and Theology (in the Radical Orthodoxy series). He admits that participation can affirm the material and bodily as instruments for the soul's salvation, but questions whether Pickstock has done justice to the fact that, for Plato, embodiment is the result of a "fall." As he says, "On a radically incarnational or creational register, the material does not play a simply 'remedial' role in a postlapsarian state of affairs, but rather an integral and essential role for creatures AS created." By contrast, "a participatory ontology only affirms materiality and embodiment as a kind of 'necessary evil' based on a prior determination of embodiment as already constituted by a fall" (pp. 176-7).

Much of this depends on what is meant by "participation," of course, but Smith's cautions against equating incarnation with participation are beneficial.

posted by Peter J. Leithart on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 at 11:47 AM

Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
- Celebrity
- Obama's faith
- The Gaze
- Sacrifice and death
- Derrida the theologian
- Miriam's leprosy
- Prematurely white
- Gift of the Text
- Calvin, Milbank, and Gifts
- Derrida on Gifts
- Ontology of Personhood
- Knowing God Twice
- Unity or Revelation
- Engaging Barth
- Eucharistic exhortation
- Exhortation
- Unread books
- Vestiges of Perichoresis
- Hooray for Hollywood
- Augustine on the web
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
LINKS
- Biblical Horizons
- Covenant Worldview Institute
- Theologia
SYNDICATE

XML  |   RDF

CONTACT

Comments:
leithart@leithart.com

Problems:
webmaster@leithart.com