Between Babel and Beast
(America and Empires in Biblical Perspective)

The Glory of Kings: A Festschrift for James B. Jordan

Fyodor Dostoevsky
(Christian Encounters Series)

Athanasius
(Foundations of Theological Exegesis and Christian Spirituality)

The Four: A Survey of the Gospels

Defending Constantine: The Twilight of an Empire and the Dawn of Christendom

From Behind the Veil: The Epistles of John

Deep Exegesis:The Mystery of Reading Scripture

1 & 2 Kings
Brazos Theological Commentary

The Promise Of His Appearing: An Exposition Of Second Peter

A Great Mystery: Fourteen Wedding Sermons

Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, And Hope In Western Literature

Miniatures & Morals: The Christian Novels of Jane Austen

The Priesthood of the Plebs: A Theology of Baptism

A Son To Me: An Exposition of 1 & 2 Samuel

From Silence to Song: The Davidic Liturgical Revolution

Ascent to Love: A Guide to Dante's Divine Comedy

Blessed Are the Hungry: Meditations on the Lord's Supper

A House For My Name: A Survey of the Old Testament

Heroes of the City of Man: A Christian Guide to Select Ancient Literature

Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide To Six Shakespeare Plays

Wise Words: Family Stories That Bring the Proverbs to Life

The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church
In his contribution to Rethinking Trinitarian Theology: Disputed Questions And Contemporary Issues in Trinitarian Theology, Emmanuel Durand offers an Augustinian treatment of the role of the Spirit in the Father-Son relation: Generation is not merely a “mechanical” operation of divine essence or of the Father, but an expression of love. Love must accompany “ever father worthy of the name,” and thus “One could say that this love is ‘concomitant’ to generation.”
More elaborately,
“Connected to the very act of generation that eternally places the Son as the Beloved of the Father, the Spirit proceeds as precisely this love of the Father for the Son. Without being the principle of the Son in any way, the Holy Spirit is nevertheless eternally present in the very ‘place’ of his eternal birth . . . as the paternal Love that eternally ‘hypostates’ itself in its reposing on the Son. The Son is himself fully Son in the very fact that He returns this same Love to the Father in eternal thanksgiving. This returning of a received, filial Love to its paternal Source achieves the Trinitarian cycle of eternal life.” This we find “a first form of Trinitarian reciprocity” in “the return of Love given to the Father by the Son.”
As Durand points out, this mode of specifying the Father’s hypostasis avoids the problems of a merely apophatic discussion of the Father as “ungenerated”: “The hypostasis of the Father can be negatively characterized, as He who has no origin, or positively, by his acts and relations. If one takes the perichoresis of the three divine Persons into account, it is not relevant to begin by situating the Father independently from his relation to the Son and his relation to the Spirit in a negative manner. We should adopt, even for the Father, a relative concept of Person, in conformity with the Thomistic doctrine of the Trinitarian Person understood as subsisting relation” (184-5).
posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, September 11, 2012 at 5:48 am
Permission is given to use material on this site, provided the source is cited, blog entries are republished in full, and the author is notified in advance.