Go home!



NOTE: This is a fan page.
Dr. Leithart does not have a Facebook account.

RECENT ENTRIES
-Moving Day
-Senecan Pepys
-Gentlemanly Ethics
-Crossed out
-Seneca in English
-Sermon notes
-Pop Culture
-Unchained Bible
-Res Publica
-Spiritual commerce
-Draw near to hear
-Musical evangelism
-Voice of the Martyrs
-Trinity Institute: Norman Shepherd Says
-Trinity Institute: A Student Perspective
-For My Name’s Sake
-Iron sinews
-Sermon notes
-Seeking worshipers
-Responsive craft
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    |
    |

    Philosophy: Musical knowing

    [Print] | [PDF] | [Email]

    Reader Cas Saternos offers these thoughts in response to a post several weeks ago on knowing.  The rest of this post is from him:

    Your comments on the three stage or “moments” of knowing fit well with the use of the term “know” in the musical realm.  Consider the phrase “I know that song.”  Depending on the speaker and context, each of the three stages might be at the fore-front.

    1)  Used commonly to mean “I recognize the melody.” This fits with subject-object differentiation, knowing the object from a distance.

    2)  Spoken by a musician mean “I can perform or participate in a performance of that song.”  This corresponds to subject-object union, knowing the object by indwelling it in love.

    3)  Spoken by a composer of one of his own compositions.  The creation of a third from the union of subject and object, the formation of a fresh concept or insight begotten of the union with the object.

    This also leads to some interesting lines of inquiry related to the personal nature of truth (rather than it being abstract and impersonal), and the epistemological implications of time, place and person for understanding the meaning of words.

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Wednesday, August 8, 2012 at 8:26 am