Between Babel and Beast
(America and Empires in Biblical Perspective)

The Glory of Kings: A Festschrift for James B. Jordan

Fyodor Dostoevsky
(Christian Encounters Series)

Athanasius
(Foundations of Theological Exegesis and Christian Spirituality)

The Four: A Survey of the Gospels

Defending Constantine: The Twilight of an Empire and the Dawn of Christendom

From Behind the Veil: The Epistles of John

Deep Exegesis:The Mystery of Reading Scripture

1 & 2 Kings
Brazos Theological Commentary

The Promise Of His Appearing: An Exposition Of Second Peter

A Great Mystery: Fourteen Wedding Sermons

Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, And Hope In Western Literature

Miniatures & Morals: The Christian Novels of Jane Austen

The Priesthood of the Plebs: A Theology of Baptism

A Son To Me: An Exposition of 1 & 2 Samuel

From Silence to Song: The Davidic Liturgical Revolution

Ascent to Love: A Guide to Dante's Divine Comedy

Blessed Are the Hungry: Meditations on the Lord's Supper

A House For My Name: A Survey of the Old Testament

Heroes of the City of Man: A Christian Guide to Select Ancient Literature

Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide To Six Shakespeare Plays

Wise Words: Family Stories That Bring the Proverbs to Life

The Kingdom and the Power: Rediscovering the Centrality of the Church
In an article in VT from 1993, Jerome Walsh analyzes the strructure of Isaiah 41:8-9 as follows:
A. Israel
A’. My servant
B. Jacob
B’. You whom I have chosen
C. Seed of my beloved Abraham
C’. You whom I have held firm and called.
But then he notes that the cycle starts over: “the text has seduced us” (p. 361).
A”. You are my servant
B”. I have chosen you
C”. and have not rejected you.
He offers this commentary on the structure: ‘‘The effect of this textual seduction is double vision. We first read ‘my beloved’ in apposition to ‘seed of Abraham’; we are the seed, we are the beloved. Only later do we discover the second reading: Abraham is the beloved (note the triple alliteration that unifies the phrase Abraham ^ohabì). The second reading does not cancel the first, but transforms it: our friendship with Yahweh is a reflex and continuation of Abraham’s. This double vision involves a second set of ambiguities in the verses, namely the relative clauses themselves. The content of the clauses is in each case appropriate to the patriarch named: Jacob was the chosen of the Lord; Abraham was brought from distant lands by God’s hand. But the second-person forms make it clear that the clauses refer to the addressee and not to the patriarchs. Our election is congruent with Jacob’s; our rescue from these lands where Abraham sojourned is as sure as his.”
posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 3:35 am
Permission is given to use material on this site, provided the source is cited, blog entries are republished in full, and the author is notified in advance.