Go home!


Go register!
RECENT ENTRIES
-Pharisees and tombs
-New Tomb
-Aristotle’s Wonder
-Mary
-Ministering to Jesus
-Theoria
-Mary the Tower
-Women from Galilee
-Replacing Peter
-Wonder
-Desire and knowledge
-Learning to Read
-Song of Israel
-Need for allegory
-Turn from allegory
-Cartesian pathologies
-Embodiment and Being
-Imputed responsibility
-Self and Justification
-Humanism to Holocaust
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Theology - Trinity: God of Future

    [Print] | [PDF] | [Email]

    Gregory of Nyssa identifies Arianism as a form of tragic metaphysics.  They go astray because they “define God’s being by its having no beginning, rather than by its having no end. . . . If they must divide eternity, let them reverse their doctrine and find that mark of deity in endless futurity. . . ; let them guide their thinking by what is to come and is real in hope rather than by what is past and old.”

    Against the Arians, Gregory insists that it’s precisely because the Logos acts and suffers and breaks the boundary of death that He proves Himself to be God.

    An eschatological ontology, that.  Jenson adds: “Aristotle’s and Plato’s divinity is the stillness for which moving things long; the being of Gregory’s God is that he keeps things moving.  To be God is always to be open to and always to open a future, transgressing all past-imposed conditions.”

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 8:25 am