Go home!


Go register!
RECENT ENTRIES
-Sermon notes
-Under the sun
-Raising the House of Israel
-Israel of the Afflicted
-Destroy this temple
-Spirit in Matthew
-Spirit of Elijah
-He Calls Elijah
-Eli, Eli
-Love’s power
-The Song’s Imagery, again
-Wisdom
-Faith
-Notes on Matthew 27
-The Song’s Imagery
-Sight and speech
-Structures in Matthew 27
-Solomon’s crown
-My dove
-Liturgical test
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Theology - Liturgical: Deconstruction and de-liturgization

    [Print] | [PDF] | [Email]

    Richard Fenn (Liturgies and Trials) notes that serious, absolutely binding speech – promises, for instance – is comparatively rare in normal conversation.  When we do make binding promises, we give ad receive “signs and symbols that something out of the ordinary is occurring” – an oath, an exchange of rings, witnesses.

    He sums up, “The liturgical language of religion is therefore the last human defense against the slipperiness, ambiguity, and uncertainty of all human acts of speech; and even these liturgical guarantees are widely known to fail.”

    Is it a surprise, then, that deconstruction and all the modes of postmodern suspicion should arise on the heels of the de-liturgization of social life?

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, November 8, 2008 at 2:11 pm