Go home!


Go register!
RECENT ENTRIES
-Extinction of Europe?
-Testing Jesus
-Roman Patronage
-Genetic Platonism
-Sermon notes, Sunday after Epiphany
-Eucharistic Meditation, Second Sunday After Christmas
-Exhortation, Second Sunday After Christmas
-Transsiberian
-Persian chivalry
-Burckhardt’s style
-Afterlife of Baal
-Dutch Isis
-Pagan Stylites
-Fasting and pleasure
-Ashes and Dust
-Idolatry and culture
-Reformed fasting
-Greek and ANE
-The City
-Time and Incarnation
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Theology - Liturgical: Deconstruction and de-liturgization

    [Print] | [Email]

    Richard Fenn (Liturgies and Trials) notes that serious, absolutely binding speech - promises, for instance - is comparatively rare in normal conversation.  When we do make binding promises, we give ad receive “signs and symbols that something out of the ordinary is occurring” - an oath, an exchange of rings, witnesses.

    He sums up, “The liturgical language of religion is therefore the last human defense against the slipperiness, ambiguity, and uncertainty of all human acts of speech; and even these liturgical guarantees are widely known to fail.”

    Is it a surprise, then, that deconstruction and all the modes of postmodern suspicion should arise on the heels of the de-liturgization of social life?

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, November 8, 2008 at 2:11 pm