Go home!


Go register!
RECENT ENTRIES
-Euhemerist typology
-Ascension in song
-Eucharistic meditation
-Exhortation
-Truth and Error
-Persona again
-Persona
-Feast of Rededication
-Savage Miracles
-Hebrew and Hellenist
-Maximilian the martyr
-Orientalizing revolution
-Monastic conformism
-Linguistic Girardianism
-Carthaginian Tophet
-Apsethus the god
-Failure of the Church
-Moses and Christ
-Truth and Freedom
-What Rough Beast?
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Theology - Liturgical: Deconstruction and de-liturgization

    [Print] | [Email]

    Richard Fenn (Liturgies and Trials) notes that serious, absolutely binding speech - promises, for instance - is comparatively rare in normal conversation.  When we do make binding promises, we give ad receive “signs and symbols that something out of the ordinary is occurring” - an oath, an exchange of rings, witnesses.

    He sums up, “The liturgical language of religion is therefore the last human defense against the slipperiness, ambiguity, and uncertainty of all human acts of speech; and even these liturgical guarantees are widely known to fail.”

    Is it a surprise, then, that deconstruction and all the modes of postmodern suspicion should arise on the heels of the de-liturgization of social life?

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, November 8, 2008 at 2:11 pm