Go home!


Go register!
RECENT ENTRIES
-Beginning With Moses
-Arian Sacramental theology
-Metaphor within a Simile
-Dickinson’s baptism
-Eternal creation
-Theology of Love
-Being and Expression
-Primacy of Darkness
-Unsurpassable word
-Sermon and Woes
-Open mouth
-Into the Sanctuary
-Communion in Body
-Justice of Zeus
-Limited justice
-Sermon notes
-Save, Salvation, Savior
-Cucumber field
-Inverted Blason
-Insurrection
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT
    Peter J. Leithart on Facebook

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    |
    |

    Theology - Liturgical: Deconstruction and de-liturgization

    [Print] | [PDF] | [Email]

    Richard Fenn (Liturgies and Trials) notes that serious, absolutely binding speech – promises, for instance – is comparatively rare in normal conversation.  When we do make binding promises, we give ad receive “signs and symbols that something out of the ordinary is occurring” – an oath, an exchange of rings, witnesses.

    He sums up, “The liturgical language of religion is therefore the last human defense against the slipperiness, ambiguity, and uncertainty of all human acts of speech; and even these liturgical guarantees are widely known to fail.”

    Is it a surprise, then, that deconstruction and all the modes of postmodern suspicion should arise on the heels of the de-liturgization of social life?

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, November 8, 2008 at 2:11 pm