Go home!


Go register!
RECENT ENTRIES
-Euhemerist typology
-Ascension in song
-Eucharistic meditation
-Exhortation
-Truth and Error
-Persona again
-Persona
-Feast of Rededication
-Savage Miracles
-Hebrew and Hellenist
-Maximilian the martyr
-Orientalizing revolution
-Monastic conformism
-Linguistic Girardianism
-Carthaginian Tophet
-Apsethus the god
-Failure of the Church
-Moses and Christ
-Truth and Freedom
-What Rough Beast?
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Philosophy: Dark Sayings

    [Print] | [Email]

    Why does Hamann write so “darkly”?  Betz suggests that in part “it should be seen as a calculated attempt to show up the Aufklarer, i.e., to show that they are not as bright as they think, indeed, to force upon them a confession of ignorance, in order that they might thereby be made more disposed to the light of faith they (in Hamann’s view) sorely lack.”

    That worked, and didn’t.  Everyone who read Hamann commented on how difficult he is to read; but instead of seeing that this exposed their ignorance, they instead threw the fault back on Hamann - the “irrationalist.”

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, November 4, 2008 at 2:40 pm