Go home!


Go register!
RECENT ENTRIES
-Beginning With Moses
-Arian Sacramental theology
-Metaphor within a Simile
-Dickinson’s baptism
-Eternal creation
-Theology of Love
-Being and Expression
-Primacy of Darkness
-Unsurpassable word
-Sermon and Woes
-Open mouth
-Into the Sanctuary
-Communion in Body
-Justice of Zeus
-Limited justice
-Sermon notes
-Save, Salvation, Savior
-Cucumber field
-Inverted Blason
-Insurrection
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT
    Peter J. Leithart on Facebook

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    |
    |

    Philosophy: Dark Sayings

    [Print] | [PDF] | [Email]

    Why does Hamann write so “darkly”?  Betz suggests that in part “it should be seen as a calculated attempt to show up the Aufklarer, i.e., to show that they are not as bright as they think, indeed, to force upon them a confession of ignorance, in order that they might thereby be made more disposed to the light of faith they (in Hamann’s view) sorely lack.”

    That worked, and didn’t.  Everyone who read Hamann commented on how difficult he is to read; but instead of seeing that this exposed their ignorance, they instead threw the fault back on Hamann – the “irrationalist.”

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Tuesday, November 4, 2008 at 2:40 pm