Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
-Patristic Higher Criticism
-Constantine, ecumenist
-Eucharistic meditation
-Exhortation
-Public liturgy
-Liturgical politics
-Witness, Liturgy, Modernity
-Hodge on slavery
-Proto-Trinity
-Proverbs 24:10-18
-Ararat
-Jesus, Mary, and Joseph
-Respectable martyrs
-Fourth Century Tour
-Plus choses changent. . .
-Culture Wars
-Wandering
-Synoptic problem
-Total Depravity
-Captives
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Philosophy: Direction revelation

    [Print] | [Email]

    Isaiah Berlin’s book on Hamann is lively engaging, but Berlin doesn’t get Hamann.  For instance: “Hamann’s constantly repeated point is that revelation is direct contact between one spirit and another, God and ourselves.”

    Not.  The opposite is the case: His constantly repeated point is that God speaks to the creature through the creature (as Berlin earlier recognizes).  It’s the bid for “direct contact” that Hamann detests, because it bypasses Scripture, history, bodies, and all the rest of empirical creation.

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Wednesday, October 15, 2008 at 4:06 pm