Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
-Patristic Higher Criticism
-Constantine, ecumenist
-Eucharistic meditation
-Exhortation
-Public liturgy
-Liturgical politics
-Witness, Liturgy, Modernity
-Hodge on slavery
-Proto-Trinity
-Proverbs 24:10-18
-Ararat
-Jesus, Mary, and Joseph
-Respectable martyrs
-Fourth Century Tour
-Plus choses changent. . .
-Culture Wars
-Wandering
-Synoptic problem
-Total Depravity
-Captives
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Theology: Humble God

    [Print] | [Email]

    When the Arians claim that the Father made the Son to make the world, they imply that it is unworthy of God to be so directly involved in the details of the created world.  Athanasius (Orations Against the Arians) sees that the Arian God is prissy, disdainful of making things and so handing the task to the Son.  He cites Matthew 10:29 and 6:25-30 to argue that “if it is not unworthy of God to be provident even toward things so minor as the hair of the head and the sparrow and the grass of the field, neither is it unworthy of him to also make these things.” The Arian God is prissy, and prideful, keeping creatures at arm’s length.  On the contrary, Athanasius argues, “there is no pride in God.”

    Later, he returns to the same theme.  If, as some Arians argued, the Son learned to create from the Father, then the Arian God is “jealous” and “weak.”  Jealous because “he did not teach many others to be creators so that there may be many creators around him”; jealous because he reserved a communicable power to Himself and his favorite creature.  Weak because “he was not able to create on his own and needed a co-worker or assistant.”  Athanasius’s earlier response applies: “there is no pride in God.”

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 5:48 am