Go home!




RECENT ENTRIES
-Bewitched by language
-Rational is real
-Epicurean indifference revisited
-Direction revelation
-Lucretian wisdom
-Arian incoherence
-Speech-act Christology?
-Creator-creature
-Liberalism, again
-Ville des expiations
-Seventy times seven
-Getting Hamann Wrong
-Outsidelessness
-Honoring the author
-Creation’s desire
-Il n’y a pas de hors-texte
-The Body of the Universe
-Humble God
-System v. edification
-Isaiah 33
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    History: Social objects

    [Print] | [Email]

    Fabian links the ocularcentrism and spatialization of Ramism with the social science tendency to regard its object of study as, well, objects: “Once the source of any knowledge worthy of that name is thought primarily to be visual perception of objects in space, why should it be scandalous to treat the Other - other societies, other cultures, other classes within the same society - comme des choses?”  He acknowledges that Durkheim, from whom the French phrase derives, didn’t want to treat persons as objects, but argues that “he did postulate in that context that the social and cultural must assume, through observation, quantification, and systematic generalization, the same facticity that is exhibited by the choses in our field of vision.”

    Durkheim followed Enlightenment predecessors, who themselves derived their categories and instincts from ancient rhetorical sources, in formulating a “methodologie du regard.”

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 11:22 am