Go home!

RECENT ENTRIES
-Changing past and realism
-Nonfixity of past
-Union card
-Brick Hermeneutics
-Eucharistic meditation
-Baptismal meditation
-Ancient etymology
-John and Creation
-Reader Response
-Eco on Derrida
-Expression and content
-Fat Heart
-From Creator-creature to Subject-object
-God-like Hirsch
-Sacraments and texts
-Another hermeneutical parable
-A Hermeneutical parable
-Enlightened Romanticism
-Sabbath
-Style as proof
CATEGORY ARCHIVES
  • LINKS
    - Biblical Horizons
    - Covenant Worldview Institute
    - Theologia
    FEED

    CONTACT

    Comments:
    leithart@leithart.com

    Problems:
    webmaster@leithart.com





    « Previous Post | Next Post »
    « Previous post in category | Next post in category »

    Theology - Soteriology: Law and gospel

    [Print] | [Email]

    A strict distinction between law and gospel is offered as a prophylactic against works-righteousness.  If it is admitted that law is gospel in any sense, all is lost.

    But this view assumes the very same view of law that it contests.  A proponent of works righteousness sees the law as demands that need to be kept, and the end of the law is simply its keeping.  The proponent of law/gospel segregation has the same view of law.

    Both detach law from its purpose, which, as Knight argues, is eschatological.  Law exists to correct, instruct, lead to maturity.  And to that extent, law is always intended as, and in practice often is, good news.

    posted by Peter J. Leithart on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 12:24 pm